2023 StarHorse results for spectroscopic surveys + Gaia DR3

StarHorse results for spectroscopic surveys + Gaia DR3: Chrono-chemical populations in the solar vicinity, the genuine thick disk, and young-alpha rich stars

by A.Queiroz, et al. (2023)

Abstract

The Gaia mission has provided an invaluable wealth of astrometric data for more than a billion stars in our Galaxy. The synergy between Gaia astrometry, photometry, and spectroscopic surveys give us comprehensive information about the Milky Way. Using the Bayesian isochrone-fitting code StarHorse, we derive distances and extinctions for more than 10 million unique stars observed by both Gaia Data Release 3 as well as public spectroscopic surveys: 557 559 in GALAH+ DR3, 4 531 028 in LAMOST DR7 LRS, 347 535 in LAMOST DR7 MRS, 562 424 in APOGEE DR17, 471 490 in RAVE DR6, 249 991 in SDSS DR12 (optical spectra from BOSS and SEGUE), 67 562 in the Gaia-ESO DR3 survey, and 4 211 087 in the Gaia RVS part of Gaia DR3 release. StarHorse can extend the precision of distances and extinctions measurements where Gaia parallaxes alone would be uncertain. We use StarHorse for the first time to derive stellar age for main-sequence turnoff and subgiant branch stars (MSTO-SGB), around 2.5 million stars with age uncertainties typically around 30%, 15% for only SGB stars, depending on the resolution of the survey. With the derived ages in hand, we investigate the chemical-age relations. In particular, the α and neutron-capture element ratios versus age in the solar neighbourhood show trends similar to previous works, validating our ages. We use the chemical abundances from local subgiant samples of GALAH DR3, APOGEE DR17 and LAMOST MRS DR7 to map groups with similar chemical compositions and StarHorse ages with the dimensionality reduction technique t-SNE and the clustering algorithm HDBSCAN. We identify three distinct groups in all three samples. Their kinematic properties confirm them to be the genuine chemical thick disk, the thin disk and a considerable number of young alpha-rich stars (427), which are also a part of the delivered catalogues. We confirm that the genuine thick disk’s kinematics and age properties are radically different from those of the thin disk and compatible with high-redshift (z≈2) star-forming disks with high dispersion velocities. We also find a few extra chemical populations in the GALAH DR3, thanks to the availability of neutron-capture elements.

Data versioning:

We warn users that the data first published in this domain contained misleading age results for old stars due to a piecewise age prior for thin disk. In the v2 version of the files, ages and masses are calculated using the Gaussian age priors described in Queiroz et al. 2018. Distances, temperatures, surface gravities and extinction remain the same.

The data formats

The data is available in FITS binary file format:

Getting the data

Get the list of the files:

wget  --no-check-certificate https://s3.data.aip.de:9000/shaqueiroz2023/list.txt

Download the data:

wget --no-check-certificate -i list.txt

APOGEE DR17 SH

Gaia RVS SH

GALAH DR3 SH

GES DR5 SH

LAMOST LRS DR7 SH

LAMOST MRS DR7 SH

RAVE DR6 SH

SDSS DR12 SH

  • Access examples: TBD

StarHorse Data Model

The tables are in the same format described in the appendix of Queiroz et al. 2020

Column Description Unit
Survey ID General Identifier from each survey -
DR3_source_id Gaia DR3 unique ID -
GLON Galactic longitude degrees
GLAT Galactic latitude degrees
mass16 16th percentil of marginalized PDF Solar masses
mass50 50th percentil of marginalized PDF Solar masses
mass84 84th percentil of marginalized PDF Solar masses
teff16 16th percentil of marginalized PDF Kelvins
teff50 50th percentil of marginalized PDF Kelvins
teff84 84th percentil of marginalized PDF Kelvins
logg16 16th percentil of marginalized PDF dex
logg50 16th percentil of marginalized PDF dex
logg84 84th percentil of marginalized PDF dex
met16 16th percentil of marginalized PDF dex
met50 50th percentil of marginalized PDF dex
met84 84th percentil of marginalized PDF dex
dist05 05th percentil of marginalized PDF kpc
dist16 16th percentil of marginalized PDF kpc
dist50 50th percentil of marginalized PDF kpc
dist84 84th percentil of marginalized PDF kpc
dist95 95th percentil of marginalized PDF kpc
AV05 05th percentil of marginalized PDF mag
AV16 16th percentil of marginalized PDF mag
AV50 50th percentil of marginalized PDF mag
AV84 84th percentil of marginalized PDF mag
AV95 95th percentil of marginalized PDF mag
age05 05th percentil of marginalized PDF Gyr
age16 16th percentil of marginalized PDF Gyr
age50 50th percentil of marginalized PDF Gyr
age84 84th percentil of marginalized PDF Gyr
age95 95th percentil of marginalized PDF Gyr
StarHorse_INPUTFLAG flag specifying input data and quality -
StarHorse_OUTPUTFLAG flag specifying StarHorse results quality -
StarHorse_AGEFLAG flag specifying age results for evolutionary stage -
StarHorse_AGEINOUT Warning on age results -

StarHorse Flags

Four flags accompaign the tables:

SH_INPUTFLAGS Description
"TEFF.." calibrated spectroscopic parameters (e.g. TEFF) were used
"uncalTEFF.." uncalibrated spectroscopic parameters (e.g. TEFF) + inflated uncertainties were used
"PARALLAX" Gaia EDR3 parallaxes + recalibrated zeropoint and uncertainties were used
"..2mass.." eg. 2MASS photometry was used (other photometric sets: Wise, panstarrs, SM)
"AV_prior" AV prior from extinction maps or targeting was used
StarHorse_OUTPUTFLAGS Description
"NEGATIVE_EXTINCTION" "bad extinction estimates"
"NUMMODELS_HIGH" " high number of stellar models compatible with observations within"
"NUMMODELS_LOW" " Low number of stellar models compatible with observations within"
StarHorse_AGEFLAG Description
"NOAGE" "stars outside the main sequence turn-off range, no ages are derived"
"MSTO" " Stars at the main sequence turn-off regime"
"SGB" " stars at the subgiant branch regime, those have the best age estimates"
StarHorse_AGEINOUT Description
"Warn_diff_inout" "Warning for using the age results for which initial temperatures, metallicites or surface gravities deviate from input data by more than 300 K, 0.3 dex and 0.3 dex respectively."

Citations

Refer to the following papers when describing StarHorse method: Santiago et al 2016 ; Queiroz et al 2018; Anders et al 2019
Refer to Queiroz et al. 2023 when using this data.